REVIEW PAPER
Dental abnormalities in children with cleft lip with or without cleft palate
1
Department of Jaw Orthopaedics, Medical University of Lublin, Poland
J Pre Clin Clin Res. 2021;15(1):46-49
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CLP) is associated with hypodontia, supernumerary teeth, dysmorphology of the crown or root shape, teeth impaction and malposition. The prevalence of anomalies is higher than in general population.
Objective:
The aim of the review is description of dental anomalies affecting children with cleft lip or without cleft palate
Abbreviated description of the state of knowledge:
The most common anomaly is teeth agenesis with prevalence of 28% – 66% of patients with CLP. Permanent dentition is more often affected (52.7%) than primary (16.2%), the cleft-side lateral incisor is most often missing. Hypodontia increases with severity of the cleft. Supernumeraries were found in 17.7% of the subjects with cleft lip and/or palate for primary maxillary dentition, and in 5.7% for permanent maxillary dentition. Supernumerary teeth are mostly maxillary laterals, both inside and outside the cleft, and have different variations in morphology and size. The anterior maxilla is a main area for supernumeraries occurrence. Lateral incisor in the cleft area is often peg-shaped, its microdontia was revealed in 5.6%; they can also have enamel hypoplasia – 8.9% of cases. Macrodontia was found in 12.5% and taurodontism in 15.2%. Canine impaction prevalence is different in studies from various cleft centres and ranged from 0% – 58%. Rotations of central incisors was found in the area of cleft in 86.7%. Transposition of maxillary canine and first premolars was found in 5.5% of bilateral, 8% of right, and 3.3% of left unilateral clefts in the study.
Summary:
Multiple teeth anomalies affect the population of children with cleft lip with or without palate. The most common problem is hypodontia. Treatment process of these patients demands experienced specialists in different fields of dentistry and complex, rigorous dental care
Cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CLP) is associated with hypodontia, supernumerary teeth, dysmorphology of the crown or root shape, teeth impaction and malposition. The prevalence of anomalies is higher than in general population.
Objective:
The aim of the review is description of dental anomalies affecting children with cleft lip or without cleft palate
Abbreviated description of the state of knowledge:
The most common anomaly is teeth agenesis with prevalence of 28% – 66% of patients with CLP. Permanent dentition is more often affected (52.7%) than primary (16.2%), the cleft-side lateral incisor is most often missing. Hypodontia increases with severity of the cleft. Supernumeraries were found in 17.7% of the subjects with cleft lip and/or palate for primary maxillary dentition, and in 5.7% for permanent maxillary dentition. Supernumerary teeth are mostly maxillary laterals, both inside and outside the cleft, and have different variations in morphology and size. The anterior maxilla is a main area for supernumeraries occurrence. Lateral incisor in the cleft area is often peg-shaped, its microdontia was revealed in 5.6%; they can also have enamel hypoplasia – 8.9% of cases. Macrodontia was found in 12.5% and taurodontism in 15.2%. Canine impaction prevalence is different in studies from various cleft centres and ranged from 0% – 58%. Rotations of central incisors was found in the area of cleft in 86.7%. Transposition of maxillary canine and first premolars was found in 5.5% of bilateral, 8% of right, and 3.3% of left unilateral clefts in the study.
Summary:
Multiple teeth anomalies affect the population of children with cleft lip with or without palate. The most common problem is hypodontia. Treatment process of these patients demands experienced specialists in different fields of dentistry and complex, rigorous dental care
Lasota A. Dental abnormalities in children with cleft lip with or without cleft palate. J Pre-Clin Clin Res. 2021; 15(1): 46–49.
doi: 10.26444/jpccr/134178
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Dixon MJ, Marazita ML, Beaty TH, et al. Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet. 2011; 12: 167–178.
2.
Phan M, Conte F, Khandelwal KD, et al. Tooth agenesis and orofacial clefting: genetic brothers in arms? Hum Genet. 2016; 135(12): 1299–1327. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1733-z.
3.
Howe BJ, Cooper ME, Vieira AR, et al. Spectrum of Dental Phenotypes in Nonsyndromic Orofacial Clefting. J Dent Res. 2015; 94(7): 905–12. doi: 10.1177/0022034515588281.
4.
Al Jamal GA, Hazza’a AM, Rawashdeh MA. Prevalence of dental anomalies in a population of cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010; 47(4): 413–20. doi: 10.1597/08-275.1.
5.
Marzouk T, Alves IL, Wong CL, et al. Association between Dental Anomalies and Orofacial Clefts: A Meta-analysis. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2020 Oct; 8: 2380084420964795. doi: 10.1177/2380084420964795.
6.
Eslami N, Majidi MR, Aliakbarian M, Hasanzadeh N. Prevalence of dental anomalies in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24(5): 1695-8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801bc8.
7.
Salomón Yezioro-Rubinsky, Javier H Eslava-Schmalbach, Liliana Otero et al. Observational Study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147(2): 221–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.024.
8.
Germec Cakan D, Nur Yilmaz RB, Bulut FN, et al. Dental Anomalies in Different Types of Cleft Lip and Palate: Is There Any Relation? J Craniofac Surg. 2018; 29(5): 1316–1321. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004359.
9.
Jamilian A, Jamilian M, Darnahal A, et al. Hypodontia and supernumerary and impacted teeth in children with various types of clefts. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Feb; 147(2): 221–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.024.
10.
Sá J, Araújo L, Guimarães L, Maranhão S, et al. Dental anomalies inside the cleft region in individuals with nonsyndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016; 21: 48–52.
11.
Suzuki A, Nakano M, Yoshizaki K, et al. A Longitudinal Study of the Presence of Dental Anomalies in the Primary and Permanent Dentitions of Cleft Lip and/or Palate Patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017; 54(3): 309–320. doi: 10.1597/15-186.
12.
Bartzela TN, Carels CE, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Tooth agenesis patterns in unilateral cleft lip and palate in humans. Arch Oral Biol. 2013; 58: 596–602.
13.
Khandelwal KD, Ishorst N, Zhou H, et al. Novel IRF6 Mutations Detected in Orofacial Cleft Patients by Targeted Massively Parallel Sequencing. J Dent Res. 2017; 96(2): 179–185. doi: 10.1177/0022034516678829.
14.
Leslie EJ, Carlson JC, Shaffer JR, et al. A multi-ethnic genome-wide association study identifies novel loci for non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate on 2p24.2, 17q23 and 19q13. Hum Mol Genet. 2016; 25(13): 2862–2872. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw104.
15.
Zucchero TM, Cooper ME, Maher BS, et al. Interferon regulatory factor 6 (IRF6) gene variants and the risk of isolated cleft lip or palate. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(8): 769–780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
16.
Kondo S, Schutte BC, Richardson RJ, et al. 2002. Mutations in IRF6 cause Van der Woude and popliteal pterygium syndromes. Nat Genet. 32(2): 285–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
17.
Blackburn J, Ohazama A, Kawasaki K, et al. The role of Irf6 in tooth epithelial invagination. Dev Biol. 2012; 365(1): 61–70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar].
18.
Chu EY, Tamasas B, Fong H, et al. Full Spectrum of Postnatal Tooth Phenotypes in a Novel Irf6 Cleft Lip Model. J Dent Res. 2016 Oct; 95(11): 1265–73. doi: 10.1177/0022034516656787.
19.
Goudy S, Angel P, Jacobs B, Hill C, et al. Cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous roles for IRF6 during development of the tongue. PLoS One. 2013; 8(2): e56270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056270.
20.
Ke CY, Xiao WL, Chen CM, Lo LJ, Wong FH. IRF6 is the mediator of TGFβ3 during regulation of the epithelial mesenchymal transition and palatal fusion. Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 4; 5: 12791. doi: 10.1038/srep12791. PMID: 26240017; PMCID: PMC4523936.
21.
Kurosaka H, Iulianella A, Williams T, et al. Disrupting hedgehog and WNT signaling interactions promotes cleft lip pathogenesis. J Clin Invest. 2014; 124(4): 1660–71. doi: 10.1172/JCI72688.
22.
Oberoi S, Vargervik K. Hypoplasia and hypodontia in Van der Woude syndrome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005; 42(5): 459–66. doi: 10.1597/04-028.1.
23.
Rullo R, Festa VM, Rullo R, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in children with cleft lip and unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2015; 16(3): 229–32.
24.
Mikulewicz M, Ogiński T, Gedrange T, et al. Prevalence of second premolar hypodontia in the Polish cleft lip and palate population. Med Sci Monit. 2014; 3; 20: 355–60. doi: 10.12659/MSM.890386.
25.
Mangione F, Nguyen L, Foumou N, et al. Cleft palate with/without cleft lip in French children: radiographic evaluation of prevalence, location and coexistence of dental anomalies inside and outside cleft region. Clin Oral Investig. 2018; 22(2): 689–695. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2141-z.
26.
Riis LC, Kjær I, Mølsted K. Dental anomalies in different cleft groups related to neural crest developmental fields contributes to the understanding of cleft aetiology. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2014; 48: 126 –131.
27.
Aizenbud D, Coval M, Hazan-Molina H, et al. Isolated soft tissue cleft lip: epidemiology and associated dental anomalies. Oral Dis. 2011; 17: 221–231.
28.
Korolenkova MV, Starikova NV, Udalova NV. The role of external aetiological factors in dental anomalies in non-syndromic cleft lip and palate patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019; 20(2): 105–111. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0397-x.
29.
Tortora C, Meazzini MC, Garattini G, et al. Prevalence of abnormalities in dental structure, position, and eruption pattern in a population of unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008; 45(2): 154–62. doi: 10.1597/06-218.1.
30.
Syriac G, Joseph E, Rupesh S, et al. Prevalence, Characteristics, and Complications of Supernumerary Teeth in Nonsyndromic Pediatric Population of South India: A Clinical and Radiographic Study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017; 9(Suppl 1): S231-S236. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_154_17.
31.
Pradhan L, Shakya P, Thapa S, et al. Prevalence of Dental Anomalies in the Patient with Cleft Lip and Palate Visiting a Tertiary Care Hospital. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2020; 31; 58(228): 591–596. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5149.
32.
Watted N, Abdulgani Azz, Abu-Hussein M. Supernumerary teeth in permanent dentition in patients with cleft lip and palate. Int J Dent Health Sci. 2014; 1(3): 410–418.
33.
Kim NY, Baek SH. Cleft sidedness and congenitally missing or malformed permanent maxillary lateral incisors in Korean patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130(6): 752–758.
34.
Rizell S, Bellardie H, Karsten A, et al. Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: dental anomalies in 8-year olds. Eur J Orthod. 2020; 42(1): 8–14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz07.
35.
Antonarakis GS, Tsiouli K, Christou P. Mesiodistal tooth size in non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2013; 17(2): 365–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784....
36.
Rawashdeh MA, Abu Sirdaneh EO. Crown morphological abnormalities in the permanent dentition of patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg 2009; 20: 465–470.
37.
Walker SC, Mattick CR, Hobson RS, Steen IN (2009) Abnormal tooth size and morphology in subjects with cleft lip and/or palate in the north of England. Eur J Orthod 2009; 31: 68–75.
38.
Tan ELY, Kuek MC, Wong HC, et al. Secondary Dentition Characteristics in Children With Nonsyndromic Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Retrospective Study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018; 55(4): 582–589. doi: 10.1177/1055665617750489.
39.
Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Uslu O, et al. Dental anomalies in individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. Eur J Orthod. 2010 Apr; 32(2): 207–13. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp156.
40.
Küchler EC, da Motta LG, Vieira AR, et al. Side of dental anomalies and taurodontism as potential clinical markers for cleft subphenotypes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011; 48(1): 103–8. doi: 10.1597/09-159.
41.
Westerlund A, Sjöström M, Björnström L, Ransjö M. What factors are associated with impacted canines in cleft patients? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 72(11): 2109–14.
42.
Pastuszak P, Dunin-Wilczyńska I, Lasota A. Frequency of Additional Congenital Dental Anomalies in Children with Cleft Lip, Alveolar and Palate. J Clin Med. 2020; 25; 9(12): 3813. doi: 10.3390/jcm9123813.
43.
Eslami N, Majidi MR, Aliakbarian M, et al. Prevalence of dental anomalies in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2013; 24(5): 1695–8. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182801bc8.
| eISSN: | 1898-7516 |
| ISSN: | 1898-2395 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
